Or You Could Get A Sheet With A Hole In It
I was meandering through the archives of Dr. Tracy's advice column (I am trying to figure out if she's more Dr. Phil or Dr. Laura) and I had to come on over here and quote this one for you:
"In the meantime, who says you have to only make love naked? I knew a lovely chunky woman who was very very sexy. She had men all the time lined up wanting her. When she made love, she always wore a babydoll nightie which only showed her sexy legs and arms, keeping the parts that were less than slender carefully covered. She was able to make love with gusto, knowing that only her best was showing."
I honestly don't know what to say about this. But I suggest you instead listen to the wisdom of Margaret Cho, who says: "If you care what I look like when you're fucking me, you shouldn't be fucking me in the first place."
"In the meantime, who says you have to only make love naked? I knew a lovely chunky woman who was very very sexy. She had men all the time lined up wanting her. When she made love, she always wore a babydoll nightie which only showed her sexy legs and arms, keeping the parts that were less than slender carefully covered. She was able to make love with gusto, knowing that only her best was showing."
I honestly don't know what to say about this. But I suggest you instead listen to the wisdom of Margaret Cho, who says: "If you care what I look like when you're fucking me, you shouldn't be fucking me in the first place."
5 Comments:
I mean, DUH. If she had men "lined up wanting her" I don't think she needed to keep anything hidden. Dr. Tracy needs some therapy herself. What a sicko.
Uh. Right. Because a woman's most sexual attributes are her arms and legs, definitely.
WTF? Why would anyone cover the most sexual parts (at least stereotypically; YMMV) while having *sex*? Why? In God's name, WHY?
Maybe the guys were f*cking the crease in the back of her knees? Or her armpits?
-Ty ::mystified::
Oh, for the love of God. That reminds me of the assinine "advice" that women should lie on their backs while having sex because it makes their tummies look flatter. I don't think I'd be able to have an orgasm if I were focusing on looking photogenic while fucking.
Julia
"I don't think I'd be able to have an orgasm if I were focusing on looking photogenic while fucking."
Which touches on something else I kept thinking about, after I read this entry. If women keep all but their "sexy" arms and legs covered, it would be pretty damn hard to do much beyond traditional intercourse. I realize that for some women that is enough for sexual satisfaction, and I am sure there are some women out there who have orgasmic knees and elbows (though I haven't met them...I kind of wish I would, because they'd be a lot of fun to nudge over dinner in a restaurant, but I digress...) so it's essentially saying that these women should sacrifice their own sexual satisfaction in an attempt to remain attractive and servicable to men.
Which earns a very big "f*ck that sh*t" in my book.
Oh, good gracious, I didn't know you had such WIT on your site--had to laugh right out loud at the Margaret Cho quote, as well as the poster previous to me. Thank you, thank you, for making me laugh again!
Post a Comment
Links to this post:
Create a Link
<< Home